Quantcast
Channel: Zimbra Forums
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 764

Installation and Upgrade • Re: Maldua's Zimbra 10 FOSS Build system

$
0
0
I have finally opted for using: --build-release-candidate=GA-9.0.0.p39-maldua instead of the usual: --build-release-candidate=GA.
After trying this in an actual installation this is not a good idea.
First of all I had to use _ instead of - so that Rhel packages were ok with it.
Then the dots are used as separators in the zmsetup.pl function you mentioned.
The version is almost the same debian package name. It is very long and ugly.

You almost need to use an string without dots there.

Ideas:
  • Small o letter. My favourite. --build-release-candidate=GA_9o0o0op39_maldua.
  • According to Debian packages guidelines we could use a plus sign. I have no idea if I can use that in RHEL: --build-release-candidate=GA_9+0+0+p39_maldua.
  • Get rid of the dots altogether. --build-release-candidate=GA_900p39_maldua.
  • If there is no p then it might mean it's a 10.0.x build after all, just not add the version. --build-release-candidate=GA_maldua.
  • Use _ everywhere. --build-release-candidate=GA_9_0_0_p39_maldua.
Anyone has any preference?

Edit: Never mind. I've finally choosen: to use _ everywhere. --build-release-candidate=GA_9_0_0_p39_maldua.

Also, if you don't specify an specific builder id you will be asigned manual as your builder id.

Statistics: Posted by adrian.gibanel.btactic — Tue Apr 09, 2024 4:31 pm



Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 764

Trending Articles